Eidam v. Faught
Eidam v. Faught
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:22-cv-00297
Jason Eidam, Plaintiff, v. David Faught et al., Defendants.
ORDER Plaintiff Jason Eidam, an inmate of the Henderson County Jail, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights lawsuit under
42 U.S.C. § 1983alleging violations of his constitutional rights. The case was referred this case to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b). On August 1, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a report recom- mending that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 22) be granted and that this case be dismissed with prejudice. Doc. 41. To date, no objections have been filed. When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and rec- ommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass vy. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,
79 F.3d 1415, 1420(Sth Cir. 1996). Hav- ing reviewed the magistrate judge’s report and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommen- dation. The defendants’ motion (Doc. 22) is granted, the plaintiff’s motion to produce (Doc. 37) is denied, and the court dismisses this case with prejudice. So ordered by the court on September 5, 2023.
jl CAMPBELL BARKER United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown