Clark v. Unknown
Clark v. Unknown
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
TONDOM CLARK § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-CV-260 UNKNOWN DEFENDANT § ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, Tondom Clark, an inmate formerly confined at USP Beaumont, proceeding pro se, filed this Bivens-type action! against an unknown defendant. The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing Plaintiffs claims for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) [Dkt. 6]. The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge have been filed to date.’ ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in accordance with the recommendations of the magistrate judge. SIGNED this 22nd day of September, 2023.
Michael J. Truncale United States District Judge ' Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388(1971). * A copy of the Report and Recommendation was returned as undeliverable with the notation, “RTS no longer at this facility.” [Dkt. 8]. Plaintiff has yet to update the Court with his address.
Reference
- Status
- Unknown