Wright v. Jarvis
Wright v. Jarvis
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:22-cv-00289 Randal Walter Wright, Plaintiff, v. John Jarvis et al., Defendants.
ORDER Plaintiff Randal Walter Wright, an inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a civil rights lawsuit under
42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b). On August 26, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a report recom- mending that this case be dismissed without prejudice as barred by Heck v. Humphrey,
512 U.S. 477(1994), because the plaintiff’s claim conflicts with the validity of his standing conviction. Doc. 12. A copy of the report was mailed to the plaintiff, who did not file written ob- jections. When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and rec- ommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass vy. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,
79 F.3d 1415, 1420(Sth Cir. 1996). Hav- ing reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommen- dation. This case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Heck. So ordered by the court on October 10, 2023. fab BARKER United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown