Emmett v. TDCJ Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:21-cv-00243 Barry Emmett, Plaintiff, V. TDCJ Corporation et al., Defendants.

ORDER Plaintiff Barry Emmett, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled and numbered civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell, who issued a report (Doc. 147) concluding that plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunction (Docs. 104, 105, 122) should be denied for failing to meet the necessary prerequisites for a prelimi- nary injunction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65.

Plaintiff did not object to the report and recommendation.

When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and rec- ommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass vy. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Hav- ing reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommen- dation. Doc. 147. For the reasons stated in the report, plaintiff’s mo- tions for preliminary injunction (Docs. 104, 105, 122) are denied.

So ordered by the court on August 29, 2023.

J bien LL BARKER United States District Judge