UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:23-cv-00213 Jay Williams, Plaintiff, V. Botie Hillhouse, Defendant.

ORDER On May 1, 2023, plaintiff Jay Williams, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit pursuant to

. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pur- suant to

(b). The magistrate judge instructed plaintiff to either pay the $402 filing fee or submit an application to proceed 7m forma pauperis, along with a current six-month history of his inmate trust fund account within thirty days of receipt of the order. Doc. 2. Plaintiff submitted a “notice of attempt to pay,” which contained a hand-written “cou- pon” of payment. Doc. 3. Plaintiff’s coupon or personal I.0.U does not comport with the court’s order. On June 6, 2023, the magistrate judge entered a report recom- mending that plaintiff’s case be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution and failure to obey an order. Doc. 4. No objec- tions were filed within the time period to do so. When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and rec- ommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,

(5th Cir. 1996). Hav- ing reviewed the magistrate judge’s report and being satisfied that the report contains no clear error, the court accepts the findings and conclusions of the report. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with a court order.

~1~

So ordered by the court on October 23, 2023.

ji (CAMPBELL BARKER United States District Judge