Jones v. McNeil
Jones v. McNeil
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:23-cv-00378 James Jones, Plaintiff, V. Warden Unknown McNeil et al., Defendants.
ORDER Plaintiff James Jones, an inmate of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit un- der
42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Mag- istrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b). On September 29, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a report rec- ommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to comply with the court’s order to satisfy the fee requirement and file an amended complaint. Doc. 5. A copy of the report was mailed to plaintiff, who sought and obtained an extension of time to file objections. Docs. 6, 7. Plaintiff’s fourteen-day exten- sion has expired without any further communication from him. When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and rec- ommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass vy. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,
79 F.3d 1415, 1420(Sth Cir. 1996). Hav- ing reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommen- dation. This case is dismissed without prejudice. So ordered by the court on December 19, 2023. fecbooka BARKER United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown