UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:23-cv-00175 Thomas Earl Criner, Plaintiff, V. Helen Bowman et al., Defendants.

ORDER Plaintiff Thomas Earl Criner, a former inmate of the Henderson County Jail proceeding pro se, filed this civil action in the form of a motion for injunctive relief complaining of alleged deprivations of his rights. The case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell. Plaintiff stated that he is a chronic diabetic with low blood sugar and sought a court order for bedside aid protein supplements or sugar aid. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss stating that plain- tiff is no longer in the Henderson County Jail. Doc 19. The defend- ants therefore argued that plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief be dismissed as moot. On October 10, 2023, the magistrate judge issued a report rec- ommending that the lawsuit be dismissed as moot. A copy of this order was sent to plaintiff’s last known address but no objections have been received. The Fifth Circuit has explained that where a let- ter is properly placed in the United States mail, a presumption exists that the letter reached its destination in the usual time and was actu- ally received by the person to whom it was addressed. Faciane v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Can.,

, 420-21 & n.9 (5th Cir. 2019). When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,

(5th Cir. 1996) (en banc). Having reviewed the magistrate

judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. The above- styled civil action is dismissed without prejudice as moot. So ordered by the court on December 4, 2023. faba BARKER United States District Judge

_2-