Williams v. General Motors Financial Company
Williams v. General Motors Financial Company
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION KYLE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. No. 4:22-CV-00736-P SUSAN SHEFFIELD,
Defendant. ORDER The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations in this case. ECF No. 25. No objections were filed within the fourteen-day window . The Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is now ripe for review and the District Judge thus reviews the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n,
79 F.3d 1415, 1428–29 (5th Cir. 1996) (en ban c), superseded by statute on other grounds,
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l) (extending time to file objections from ten to fourteen days). Finding no plain error or manifest injustice in the Magistrate’s reasoning, the undersigned District Judge ADOPTS the Findings , Conclusions, and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. It is therefore ORDERED that: (1) Sheffield's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 19) is GRANTED as Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and (2) Plaintiff's Motion to File an Amended Complaint (ECF No. 23) is DENIED as futile. SO ORDERED on this 1st day of February 2023.
Reference
- Status
- Unknown