Summerville v. Collier

District Court, N.D. Texas

Summerville v. Collier

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

WILLIAM JOSEPH SUMMERVILLE, ) ID # 2231539, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) BRYAN COLLIER, ) ) Respondent. ) Civil Action No. 3:22-CV-2150-C-BT

ORDER Before the Court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge therein advising the Court that Petitioner’s claims should be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to comply with a Court order. Petitioner failed to file timely objections. The Court conducts a de novo review of those portions of the Magistrate Judge’s report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which a timely objection is made.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C). Portions of the report or proposed findings or recommendations that are not the subject of a timely objection will be accepted by the Court unless they are clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See United States v. Wilson,

864 F.2d 1219, 1221

(Sth Cir. 1989). The Court has conducted an independent review of the Magistrate Judge’s findings and conclusions and finds no error. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

For the reasons stated therein, Petitioner’s petition in the above-styled and -numbered civil action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED. / yh Dated this A 7 day of February, 2023.

7 ‘1, 4 3424704} 3 / Dahl pore] ~_SAM R. CU GS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown