Clifton v. United States
Clifton v. United States
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JOHNNY GLENN CLIFTON, ) #56582-177 ) Petitioner ) ) vs. ) No. 3:21-CV-2507-B (BT) ) No. 3:17-CR-00641-B-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Respondent ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are ACCEPTED as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. By separate judgment, the petitioner’s motion pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2255will be denied. Moreover, considering the record in this case, the Court DENIES a certificate of appealability. The Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge’s Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation filed in this case in support of its finding that the Movant has failed to show (1) that reasonable jurists would find this Court’s “assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong,” or (2) that reasonable jurists would find “it debatable whether the [movant] states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right” and “debatable whether [this Court] was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 473, 484(2000). 1 SIGNED this 10" day of April, 2023.
JANE J. BOYIF UMITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown