Aguero v. S. Salmonson, Warden

District Court, E.D. Texas

Aguero v. S. Salmonson, Warden

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

JULIAN AGUERO, § §

§ Petitioner, §

§ v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:22-CV-71-RWS-JBB

§ WARDEN, FCI-TEXARKANA, § § Respondent. §

ORDER Before the Court is Petitioner Julian Aguero’s petition for writ of habeas corpus under

28 U.S.C. § 2241

challenging the computation of his sentence. Docket No. 1. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Boone Baxter in accordance with

28 U.S.C. § 636

. Petitioner sought credit for time which he allegedly spent in federal custody, but which had been credited to his consecutive state sentence. Docket No. 1. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report recommending that Petitioner’s writ of habeas corpus be dismissed with prejudice, as the computation of his sentence was calculated correctly. Docket No. 17. Petitioner received a copy of the Report on April 24, 2024. Docket No. 18. To date, no objections have been received. Because no objections have been received, Plaintiff is barred from de novo review by the District Judge of the Magistrate Judge’s proposed findings, conclusions and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the District Court. See Duarte v. City of Lewisville, Texas,

858 F.3d 348, 352

(5th Cir. 2017); Arriaga v. Laxminarayan, Case No. 4:21-CV-00203- RAS,

2021 WL 3287683

, at *1 (E.D. Tex. July 31, 2021). The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this case and the Report of the Magistrate Judge. Upon such review, the Court has determined the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. See United States v. Wilson,

864 F.2d 1219, 1221

(Sth Cir. 1989) (where no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the standard of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law”). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. It is further ORDERED that the Petitioner’s writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 5th day of August, 2024.

foeher t+ LU Gtrivechs. G2, ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Page 2 of 2

Reference

Status
Unknown