U S Bank Trust Company National Association v. Gatson

District Court, N.D. Texas

U S Bank Trust Company National Association v. Gatson

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, § NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as § trustee, as successor in interest to § U.S. Bank National Association, as § trustee, successor in interest to § Bank of America, National § Association, as trustee, successor by § merger to Lasalle National Bank, as § trustee for BCF L.L.C. Mortgage § pass-through certificates, series § 1997-R3, § § Plaintiff, § § V. § No. 3:24-cv-414-S-BN § HELEN GATSON, § § Defendant. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON BANKRUPTCY STAY AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE

Plaintiff U.S. Bank Trust Company National Association, as trustee, as successor in interest to U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, successor in interest to Bank of America, National Association, as trustee, successor by merger to Lasalle National Bank, as trustee for BCF L.L.C. Mortgage pass-through certificates, series 1997-R3, (“U.S. Bank Trust”) has filed a Suggestion of Bankruptcy reporting that, “Defendant Helen Gatson filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy on March 1, 2024, in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division, Case 24-40470 (the “Bankruptcy Action”).” See Dkt. No. 10 at 1-2. “As a result thereof, all actions are stayed pursuant to

11 U.S.C. Section 362

.” See

id. at 2

.

11 U.S.C. § 362

(a)(1) provides for an automatic stay of any judicial “proceeding against the debtor.” “Section 362(a)(3) provides that the filing of a petition ‘operates

as a[n] [automatic stay] applicable to all entities, of ... any act to obtain possession of property of the estate or of property from the estate’” or “to obtain or exercise control over the property of the debtor.” Matter of S.I. Acquisition, Inc.,

817 F.2d 1142, 1148

(5th Cir. 1987) (quoting

11 U.S.C. § 362

(a)(3)). In short, the automatic stay generally forestalls any action against debtors in bankruptcy. See Reliant Energy Servs., Inc. v. Enron Can. Corp.,

349 F.3d 816, 825

(5th Cir. 2003). Under the particular circumstances of this case, the Court determines that, in

the interest of justice and to appropriately control the Court’s docket, this case should be stayed until the automatic stay as to Defendant Helen Gatson is lifted, either by conclusion of the bankruptcy or an order from the bankruptcy court granting relief from the automatic stay. After the stay is lifted, the Court will enter a new scheduling order. The Court ORDERS that, because the claims against Helen Gatson in this case

are subject to

11 U.S.C. § 362

(a)’s automatic stay protections and, in an exercise of the Court’s sound discretion, the case should be stayed, subject to this stay being lifted upon the motion of any party once the

11 U.S.C. § 362

automatic stay is lifted – either by conclusion of the bankruptcy or on order from the bankruptcy court granting relief from the automatic stay – and all pending, unexpired deadlines are terminated. Rather than abate the case, the Court will administratively close this case so that it does not continue to age. Any case over three years old is considered an “old” case by the Administrative Office and is put on a national report. The age of a case continues to accrue if it is merely stayed or abated; but, if it is administratively closed, the time is tolled with the case’s age. The Court administratively closes this case and instructs the United States District Clerk to submit a JS-6 form to the Administrative Office, thereby removing this case from the statistical records. Any party may move to reopen the case and lift the stay as appropriate based on further developments. The right to seek the lifting of the stay and reopening of the case will continue until the earlier of 60 days after Defendant Helen Gatson’s bankruptcy proceedings are concluded or 60 days after entry of an order from the bankruptcy court granting relief from the automatic stay. Every 60 days after the date of entry of this order, Plaintiff U.S. Bank Trust must file a joint status report concerning the bankruptcy proceedings involving Defendant Helen Gatson, as those proceedings relate to this action. SO ORDERED. DATED: March 12, 2024

pepo DAVIDL.HORAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

-3-

Reference

Status
Unknown