Arabie v. Warren Power & Machinery Inc
Arabie v. Warren Power & Machinery Inc
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANGELO DIVISION JARED MICHAEL ARABIE, et al., Plaintiffs, LUBA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Intervenor-Plaintiff, V. No. 6:22-CV-032-H WARREN POWER & MACHINERY, INC., et al., Defendants. ORDER The United States Magistrate Judge issued Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (FCR) that the Court deny the defendants’ motion to exclude untimely and insufficiently designated experts and briefs. Dkt. No. 129. No objections were filed. Where no specific objections are filed within the 14-day period, the Court reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings, conclusions, and recommendations only for plain error. Serrano v. Customs & Border Patrol, U.S. Customs & Border Prot.,
975 F.3d 488, 502(5th Cir. 2020). The District Court has reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts and adopts the FCR. The Court hereby denies the defendants’ motion to exclude untimely and insufficiently designated experts and brief (Dkt. No. 107). So ordered on April tt, 2024. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown