King v. Lubbock ISD

District Court, N.D. Texas

King v. Lubbock ISD

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DIVISION SHAWNDA Y. MARTIN KING, Plaintiff, v. No. 5:24-CV-058-H-BQ LUBBOCK ISD, et al., Defendants. ORDER The United States Magistrate Judge issued Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation (FCR) that the Court grant defendant Zach Brady’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 13) and dismiss the plaintiff's claims against him without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 36. No objections were filed. Where no specific objections are filed within the 14-day period, the Court reviews the Magistrate Judge’s findings, conclusions, and recommendations only for plain error. Serrano v. Customs & Border Patrol, U.S. Customs & Border Prot.,

975 F.3d 488

, 502 (Sth Cir. 2020). The District Court has reviewed the FCR for plain error. Finding none, the Court accepts and adopts the FCR. The plaintiffs claims against Brady are dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. So ordered on July tH 2024. ten ee HENDRIX UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown