Damm v. The State of Texas

District Court, N.D. Texas

Damm v. The State of Texas

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

GREGORY PAUL DAMM, § #24016111 § Petitioner, § § v . § No. 3:24-cv-01769-E (BT) § D ALLAS COUNTY SHERIFF, § § Respondent. §

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto,1 in accordance with

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. By separate judgment, the petitioner’s case will be DISMISSED. SIGNED this 16th day of August, 2024.

1 Petitioner Damm filed objections on July 26, 2024. (ECF No. 13). The Court conducts a de novo review of those portions of the Magistrate Judge’s report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which a timely objection is made.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C). Portions of the report or proposed findings or recommendations that are not the subject of a timely objection will be accepted by the Court unless they are clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See United States v. Wilson,

864 F.2d 1219, 1221

(5th Cir. 1989).

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the United States Magistrate Judge’s Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation and has determined that Damm’s objections should be overruled. The Court has further conducted an independent review of the Magistrate Judge’s findings and conclusions and finds no error.

Reference

Status
Unknown