Stealth Onsite Solution, LLC v. M/V Double E

Southern District of Texas ENTERED February 12, 2024 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Nathan Ochsner, Clerk SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION STEALTH ONSITE SOLUTION, LLC., = § Plaintiff, ys § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00175 M/V Double E, et al., Defendants.

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 38). The M&R recommends that the Court deny Defendant Erickson & Jensen Seafood Packing Company’s (“E&J”) motion to dismiss for improper venue, or alternatively to transfer, (D.E. 30). (D.E. 38, p. 22).

The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIv. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Badaiki v. Schlumberger Holdings Corp., 512 F. Supp. 3d 741, 743-44 (S.D. Tex. 2021) (Eskridge, J.).

Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E.

38). Accordingly, the Court DENIES E&J’s motions to dismiss or transfer. (D.E, 30).

SO ORDERED.

DA RALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: Corpus Christi, Texas February 9, 2024 2/2