Busby v. Sanchez

District Court, S.D. Texas

Busby v. Sanchez

Trial Court Opinion

□ Southern District of Texas ENTERED March 07, 2024 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT athan Ochsner, Clerk SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION JEREMY LADON BUSBY, § § Plaintiff, § § V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-0215 § JERRY J. SANCHEZ, et al., § § Defendants. § ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason Libby’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 20). The M&R recommends that the Court dismiss this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (D-E. 20, p. 2). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1); FED. R. Clv. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

864 F.2d 1219, 1221

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Badaiki v. Schlumberger Holdings Corp.,

512 F. Supp. 3d 741

, 743-44 (S.D. Tex. 2021) (Eskridge, J.). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 20). Accordingly, all claims in this action are DISMISSED with prejudice. A final 1/2

judgment will be entered separately. SO ORDERED. | / | DA MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: Corpus Christi, Texas March 6-204

Reference

Status
Unknown