□ Southern District of Texas ENTERED May 07, 2024 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT athan Ochsner, Clerk SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION RICHARD SCOTT SHAFER, § § Plaintiff, § § V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00053 § BOBBY LUMPKIN, ef al., § § Defendants. § ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason Libby’s Memorandum and Recommendation (““M&R”). (D.E. 52). The M&R recommends that this Court grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgement, (D.E. 46), and dismiss Plaintiffs case. (D.E. 52, p. 1). Plaintiff was provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Badaiki v. Schlumberger Holdings Corp.,

, 743-44 (S.D. Tex. 2021) (Eskridge, J.). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. 1/2

(D.E. 52). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (D.E. 46). All claims in this action are DISMISSED. A final judgment will be entered separately. SO ORDERED. DA , MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: Corpus Christi, Texas May , 2024

2/2