Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT □□ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION JAMES DEAN WILSON, § Petitioner, V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00055 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, et al., § Respondents. ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason Libby’s Memorandum and Recommendation (““M&R”). (D.E. 18). The M&R recommends that the Court dismiss Petitioner’s case as time barred. Jd. at 13. The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. CIv. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Badaiki v. Schlumberger Holdings Corp.,

, 743-44 (S.D. Tex. 2021) (Eskridge, J.). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 1/2

18). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Petitioner’s case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). All claims in this action are DISMISSED. A final judgment will be entered separately. /) / SO ORDERED // Jf J f } / / / A

we tnt DAVID‘S’7 MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: Corpus Christi, Texas February 23 2024

2/2