□ Southern District of Texas ENTERED February 12, 2024 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION PAUL ALEXANDER SERRANO, § § Plaintiff, § § V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00268 § MCCONNEL UNIT., § § Defendant. § ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 8). The M&R recommends that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's claims without prejudice. (D.E. 8, p. 2). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. CIv. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Badaiki v. Schlumberger Holdings Corp.,

, 743-44 (S.D. Tex. 2021) (Eskridge, J.). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 8), Accardingly, aW ] s in thig/action are DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is INS D to fod t l., SO ORDERED. ——— DAVID S. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: Corpus Christj,Texas February 47 : 2024

1/1