HP Cattle v. Livestock Nutrition Center, LLC

District Court, S.D. Texas

HP Cattle v. Livestock Nutrition Center, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

□ Southern District of Texas ENTERED August 20, 2024 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Nathan Ochsner, Clerk SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION : HP CATTLE, ef al., § § Plaintiffs, § § V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:24-CV-00021 § LIVESTOCK NUTRITION CENTER, LLC, et § al., § § Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie Hampton’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 8). The M&R recommends that the Court grant the joint motion to remand. Jd. at 2. The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1); Feb. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

864 F.2d 1219, 1221

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700,

2015 WL 3823141

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.) (citation omitted). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 8). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the joint motion to remand, (D.E. 2), and REMANDS this case to the 25th Judicial District Court of Lavaca County, Texas. 1/2

SO ORDERED. A

pag Satan — UNITEB-SLATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: Corpus Christi, Texas August 7 phon

2/2

Reference

Status
Unknown