IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION BRONCBUSTER LLC, § § Plaintiff, § § V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. SA-24-CA-0488-FB § BRONCOMONDO, CHANGZHOU § DESAI VEHICLE PARTS CO, LTD, § XOMZEMA, § § Defendants. § ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (docket no. 7), filed in the above-captioned cause on July 23, 2024. The electronic docket sheet reflects the Report and Recommendation was sent by certified mail to Plaintiff BroncBuster LLC on July 24, 2024 (docket no. 9), and the certified mail acknowledgment receipt was received by the Court Clerk on August 2, 2024 (docket no. 10). To date, no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been received.1 Because no party has objected to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court need not conduct a de novo review. See

(b)(1) ("A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings and recommendations to which objection is made."). The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finds its reasoning to be neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(5th Cir.), cert. denied,

(1989). 1 Any party who desires to object to a Magistrate's findings and recommendations must serve and file his, her or its written objections within IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (docket no. 7) is ACCEPTED pursuant to

(b)(1) such that the above styled and numbered cause is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for want of prosecution. ITIS FINALLY ORDERED that motions pending with the Court, ifany, are Dismissed as Moot and this case is CLOSED. It is so ORDERED. SIGNED this 20th day of August, 2024.

Feet CF

D BIERY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE