District Court, W.D. Texas, 2024

Eric Fritze v. AMERCAREROYAL, LLC

Eric Fritze v. AMERCAREROYAL, LLC
District Court, W.D. Texas · Decided November 13, 2024
Eric Fritze v. AMERCAREROYAL, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION ERIC FRITZE, § § Plaintiff, § § V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. SA-23-CA-1368-FB § AMERCAREROYAL, LLC, § § Defendant. § ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (docket no. 37) concerning Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, filed in the above-captioned cause on October 28, 2024. To date, no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been received.1 Because no party has objected to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court need not conduct a de novo review. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) ("A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings and recommendations to which objection is made."). The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finds its reasoning to be neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918 (1989).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (docket no. 37) is ACCEPTED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) such that Any party who desires to object to a Magistrate's findings and recommendations must serve and file his, her or its written objections within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the findings and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 635(b)(1). If service upon a party is made by mailing a copy to the party’s last known address, “service is complete upon mailing.” FED. R. CIV. P. 5(b)(2)(C). If service is by electronic means, “service is complete upon transmission.” Id. at (E).

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (docket no. 26) is GRANTED such that this case is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that remaining motions pending with the Court, if any, are Dismissed as Moot and this case is CLOSED.

It is so ORDERED.

SIGNED this 13th day of November, 2024.

□□□ fe .

D BIERY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.