Garrison v. John Does and Janes Does Mark W. Michael Unit
Garrison v. John Does and Janes Does Mark W. Michael Unit
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:24-cv-00192 Curtis Allen Garrison, Plaintiff, v. Jane and John Does et al., Defendants.
ORDER Plaintiff Curtis Allen Garrison, a prisoner confined within the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) proceeding pro se, filed this civil-rights proceeding pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love. On August 2, 2024, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that plaintiff’s lawsuit be dismissed, without prejudice, for his failure to comply with an order of the court and to prosecute his case. Doc. 10. A copy of this report was sent to plaintiff at his last-known address. Plaintiff, however, neither filed objections nor otherwise communicated with the court. When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,
79 F.3d 1415, 1420(5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. Plaintiff’s lawsuit is dismissed, without prejudice, for his failure to comply with an order of the court and to prosecute his case. Any pending motions are denied as moot.
So ordered by the court on December 16, 2024.
ji CAMPBELL BARKER United States District Judge
_2-
Reference
- Status
- Unknown