Landry v. Townsend
Landry v. Townsend
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:23-cv-00057 Stephen Landry, Plaintiff, V. Lonnie Townsend et al., Defendants.
ORDER Plaintiff Stephen Landry, proceeding pro se and 7 forma pau- pers, filed the above-styled and numbered civil rights lawsuit pursu- ant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was referred to United States Mag- istrate Judge John D. Love. Thereafter, defendants Elizabeth Carmi- chael and Marciela Rendon filed a motion to dismiss all of plaintiff’s claims based on qualified immunity and failure to state a claim. Doc. 15. On December 18, 2023, Judge Love issued a report and recom- mendation (Doc. 20), recommending that the motion be granted, and that plaintiff’s claims be dismissed with prejudice. To date, no objections have been filed, and the time period for doing so has passed. When no party objects to the magistrate judge’s report and rec- ommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass vy. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,
79 F.3d 1415, 1420(5th Cir. 1996). Hav- ing reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommen- dation. For the reasons stated in the report, defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 15) is granted. This action is dismissed with prejudice on the basis of qualified immunity and failure to state a claim.
So ordered by the court on January 24, 2024.
j/ CAMPBELL BARKER United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown