Lumpkin v. Wellpath
Lumpkin v. Wellpath
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DAVID THOMAS LUMPKIN, JR., § § Plaintiff, § § versus § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-CV-88 § WELLPATH, § § Defendant. § ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff David Thomas Lumpkin, Jr., a federal prisoner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brought this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388(1971), against Wellpath. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. On April 30, 2024, the magistrate judge recommended dismissing the action pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the report and recommendation. The court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the United States Magistrate Judge are correct. Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#5) is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in accordance with the magistrate judge’s recommendation.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unknown