UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:21-cv-00292 John Francis, Plaintiff, v. Director, TDCJ-CID, et al., Defendants.

ORDER Plaintiff John Francis, proceeding pro se and 7 forma pauperts, filed the above-styled and numbered civil-rights lawsuit pursuant to

. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell, who issued a report (Doc. 83), recom- mending that plaintiff’s suit be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to

(e)(2)(b) and 1915A(b)(1). No objections were filed. When there have been no timely objections filed to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,

(5th Cir. 1996) (en banc). Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. Plaintiff’s civil- rights action is dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to

(e)(2)(b) and 1915A(b)(1). All motions which may be pending in this civil action are denied as moot. So ordered by the court on April 4, 2024.

yj! CAMPBELL BARKER United States District Judge