FILED January 08, 2025 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISIRICL □□ □□□□□ WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS . NM SAN ANTONIO DIVISION BY. uy MICHAEL D. JOHNSON, § Plaintiff, : v. : CIVIL NO. SA-24-CV-638-OLG DANIEL MILLS, e7 ai., : Defendants. : ORDER The Court has considered United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney’s Report and Recommendation (the “Recommendation”) (Dkt. No. 8), filed on December 5, 2024, concerning the status of this case. Plaintiff Michael D. Johnson (“Plaintiff”) did not file objections to the Recommendation. When no party objects to a magistrate judge’s recommendation, the Court need not conduct a de novo review of the entire record. See U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (“A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings and recommendation to which objection is made.”); FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Rather, the Court need only review the magistrate judge’s recommendation to determine whether it is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(5th Cir. 1989). The Court has reviewed the Recommendation and is of the opinion that it is correct. Accordingly, the Recommendation (Dkt. No. 8) is ACCEPTED and, for the reasons set forth therein, this action is DISMISSED for want of prosecution. IT IS ORDERED that this case is CLOSED. IT ISSO ORDERED.

SIGNED wis 0 day of January, 2025.

ORLANDO L. GARCIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE