Lee v. Southwest Airlines Company
Lee v. Southwest Airlines Company
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT January 27, 2025 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION TAMBRIA LEE, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § Civil Action No. 4:21-CV-01901 § SOUTHWEST AIRLINES COMPANY, § § Defendant. § ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pending before the Court is the January 9, 2025, Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”) prepared by Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Dkt. No. 139). Judge Bray made findings and conclusions and recommended that Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief Under Rule 60(b), (Dkt. No. 131), be denied. The Parties were provided proper notice and the opportunity to object to the M&R. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No party filed an objection. As a result, review is straightforward: plain error. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc.,
434 F.3d 303, 308(5th Cir. 2005). No plain error appears. Accordingly, the Court accepts the M&R and adopts it as the opinion of the Court. It is therefore ordered that: (1) Magistrate Judge Bray’s M&R, (Dkt. No. 139), is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; and (2) Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief Under Rule 60(b), (Dkt. No. 131), is DENIED. It is SO ORDERED. Signed on January 27, 2025.
DREW B. TIPTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown