Cadence Bank v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Cadence Bank v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Trial Court Opinion

□ Southern District of Texas ENTERED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT January 27, 2025 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION § CADENCE BANK, § § Plaintiff, § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. H-23-2678 § JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., § § Defendant. § § §

ORDER This court has reviewed the United States Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation on Chase Bank’s motion to dismiss Defendant EIG Investment Group LLC, (Docket Entry No. 98), and made a de novo determination. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C); United States v. Wilson,

864 F.2d 1219, 1221

(Sth Cir. 1989). No objections were filed. Based on the briefing, the record, and the applicable law, the court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation as this court’s Memorandum and Order. Chase Bank’s motion to dismiss, (Docket Entry No. 23), is granted. Because Cadence Bank failed to timely serve EIG Investment Group LLC, the claims against EIG Investment Group LLC are dismissed. SIGNED on January 27, 2025, at Houston, Texas.

LW Onto Lee H. Rosenthal Senior United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown