Gullatte v. Snead
Gullatte v. Snead
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION DELVIN GULLATTE, § § Plaintiff, § v. § Case No. 5:24-cv-00157-JRG-JBB § SGT. B. SNEAD, ET AL., § § Defendants. § ORDER OF DISMISSAL Plaintiff Delvin Gullatte, an inmate now confined in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Correctional Institutions Division proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit under
42 U.S.C. § 1983complaining of alleged violations of his constitutional rights. The lawsuit was referred to United States Magistrate Judge J. Boone Baxter. On December 16, 2024, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending the above lawsuit be dismissed without prejudice for failure to obey an order of the Court. Docket No. 9 at 2. A copy of this Report was sent to Plaintiff at his last known address, but no objections have been received. The Fifth Circuit has explained that where a letter is properly placed in the United States mail, a presumption exists that the letter reached its destination in the usual time and was actually received by the person to whom it was addressed. Faciane v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada,
931 F.3d 412, 420-21 and n.9 (5th Cir. 2019). Because no objections have been filed, Plaintiff is barred from de novo review by the District Judge of those findings, conclusions, and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the District Court. Duarte v. City of Lewisville, Texas,
858 F.3d 348, 352(5th Cir. 2017). The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this cause and the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Upon such review, the Court has determined that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. See United States v. Wilson,
864 F.2d 1219, 1221(Sth Cir.), cert. denied,
492 U.S. 918(1989) (where no objections to a Magistrate Judge’s Report are filed, the standard of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law”). It is accordingly ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 9) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. It is further ORDERED that the above-styled civil action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to obey an order of the Court. It is further ORDERED that any and all motions which may be pending in this civil action are hereby
DENIED.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 24th day of January, 2025.
RODNEY GILSTRAP \ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown