Cano v. Rubio

District Court, S.D. Texas

Cano v. Rubio

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT February 05, 2025 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk BROWNSVILLE DIVISION

MARIA FERNANDA CANO, § § Plaintiff, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-CV-003 § MARCO RUBIO1, § § Defendant. §

ORDER

In January 2024, Plaintiff Maria Fernanda Cano filed this lawsuit against Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken, in his official capacity (“United States”), seeking a declaration of nationality under

8 U.S.C. § 1503

. (Compl., Doc. 1) The United States moved to dismiss the Complaint on the grounds that it was untimely filed, depriving the Court of subject matter jurisdiction. (MtD, Doc. 27) A United States Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court grant the Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (R&R, Doc. 48) No party filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the Court finds no clear error within it.2 As a result, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 48). It is: ORDERED that Defendant Marco Rubio’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which the Court can Grant the Requested Relief (Doc. 27) is GRANTED; and ORDERED that all claims made by Maria Fernanda Cano are dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

1 Cano sued Antony J. Blinken in his official capacity as Secretary of State. On January 20, 2025, the United States Senate confirmed Marco Rubio as the nation’s new Secretary of State and he was sworn in the following day. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), Rubio is automatically substituted in as the proper defendant. The Court directs the District Clerk to update the docket sheet and case caption to reflect this change. 2 Even applying de novo review, the Court would adopt the Report and Recommendation, based on the Court’s analysis of the same legal issues in Sanchez v. Rubio, No. 7:23-CV-057,

2025 WL 289229

(S.D. Tex. Jan. 23, 2025). 1 / 2 This is a final and appealable order. Each party shall be responsible for its own fees and costs. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed on February 5, 2025.

□□ □ Fernando Rodriguez, Jr. United States District Judge

2/2

Reference

Status
Unknown