UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION ALEJANDRO EMANUEL CLAY- § ACEVEDO, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § § CIVIL NO. SA-24-CV-621-OLG EXPERIAN INFORMATION § SOLUTIONS INC., § § Defendant. § ORDER The Court has considered United States Magistrate Judge Richard B. Farrer’s Report and Recommendation (the “Recommendation”) (Dkt. No. 9), wherein Judge Farrer recommends that this action be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b) and

(e). See Dkt. No. 9 at 1,4. copy of the Recommendation was mailed to Plaintiff via certified mail on January 16, 2025, and returned as unclaimed on February 14, 2025. See Dkt. Nos. 10-11. To date, no objections have been filed. When no party objects to a magistrate judge’s recommendation, the Court need not conduct a de novo review of the entire record. See U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (“A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings and recommendation to which objection is made.”); see also FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Rather, the Court need only review the magistrate judge’s recommendation to determine whether it is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989). After reviewing the Recommendation, the Court concludes that it is correct. Accordingly, the Recommendation (Dkt. No. 9) is ACCEPTED and, for the reasons set forth therein, this case is DISMISSED.

This case is CLOSED. ITIS SO — SIGNED this day of March, 2025,

ORLANDO L. GARCIA United States District Judge