Fisher v. Trans Union LLC

District Court, W.D. Texas

Fisher v. Trans Union LLC

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION JONATHAN BYRON FISHER, § § Plaintiff, § § V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. SA-24-CA-0988-FB § TRANS UNION LLC, EXPERIAN § INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., § and EQUIFAX INFORMATION § SERVICES LLC, § § Defendant. § ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, filed in the above-captioned cause on March 13, 2025. (Docket no. 14). To date, no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been received.1 Because no party has objected to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court need not conduct a de novo review. See

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) ("A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings and recommendations to which objection is made."). The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finds its reasoning to be neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

864 F.2d 1219, 1221

(5th Cir.), cert. denied,

492 U.S. 918

(1989). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (docket no. 14) is ACCEPTED pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) such that 1 Any party who desires to object to a Magistrate's findings and recommendations must serve and file his, her or its written objections within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the findings and recommendation.

28 U.S.C. § 635

(b)(1). If service upon a party is made by mailing a copy to the party’s last known address, “service is complete upon mailing.” FED. R. CIV. P. 5(b)(2)(C). If service is by electronic means, “service is complete upon transmission.”

Id.

at (E). Defendants Trans Union LLC, Equifax Information Services LLC’s and Experian Information Solutions Inc.’s Joint Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (docket no. 10) is GRANTED. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that remaining motions pending with the Court, if any, are Dismissed as Moot and this case is CLOSED. It is so ORDERED. SIGNED this 2nd day of April, 2025.

Feet CF

D BIERY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown