Thompson v. The State Of Texas

. Southern District of Texas ENTERED April 17, 2025 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Nathan Ochsner, Clerk SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION SIDNEY MAURICE THOMPSON, IV, § Plaintiff, V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-CV-00022 THE STATE OF TEXAS, Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 8). The M&R recommends that the Court dismiss Plaintiffs claims without prejudice for failure to comply with court orders. Jd. at 2.

The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700, 2015 WL 3823141, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.) (citation omitted).

Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 8). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's claims for failure to comply with court orders. (D.E. 1). The Court will enter a final judgment separately.

1/2 SO ORDERED. ( : ( DA MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas April /7-752025 2/2