Karr v. Biden

District Court, W.D. Texas

Karr v. Biden

Trial Court Opinion

FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT April 25, 2025 SAN ANTONIO DIVISION WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS NM DONALD RICHARD KARR, JR., ON ou Plaintiff, § § v. § § JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., UNITED § STATES OF AMERICA, § NO. SA-24-CV-00344-OLG DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS § AFFAIR, DENIS MCDONOGH, § SECRETARY, VETERANS AFFAIR; § VETERANS AFFAIR UNION AFGE § (AFOL-CIO), TRICARE § INSURANCE, DONALD LEE KARR, § DOES 1 THRU 1,500 DOES, § § Defendants. § ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Court has considered United States Magistrate Judge Richard B. Farrer’s Report and Recommendation (R&R), filed December 11, 2024, concerning Plaintiff’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (See R&R, Dkt. No. 9.) Any party who desires to object to a Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations must serve and file specific written objections within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the findings and recommendations. FED. R. CIv. P. 72(b)(2). A copy of the R&R was mailed via certified mail on December 12, 2024 (see Dkt. No. 10) and received on December 26, 2024 (see Dkt. No. 11). No objections have been filed. Because no party has objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendations, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See United States v. Wilson,

864 F.2d 1219, 1221

(Sth Cir. 1989); cf

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) (“A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which an

objection is made.) After such review, the Court finds that the R&R is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Dkt. No. 9) and, for the reasons set forth therein, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2)(B)(i). This case is CLOSED. It isso ORDERED. SIGNED this Vv? day of April, 2025.

ORLANDO L. GARCIA United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown