Contreras v. First Premier Bank

District Court, W.D. Texas

Contreras v. First Premier Bank

Trial Court Opinion

FILED April 30, 2025 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ona Us DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION NM BY: JASON CONTRERAS, § □□□□□□ § Plaintiff, § § v. § § NO. SA-24-CV-01264-OLG FIRST PREMIER BANK and § ADAM NORTH, EXECUTIVE § FRAUD DEPT., § § Defendants. § ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Court has considered United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth S. Chestney’s Report and Recommendation (R&R), filed January 21, 2025, concerning this case, in which Plaintiff was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. (See R&R, Dkt. No. 5.) Any party who desires to object to a Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations must serve and file specific written objections within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the findings and recommendations. FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). A copy of the R&R was mailed via certified mail on January 22, 2025 (see Dkt. No. 6) and received on January 25, 2025 (see Dkt. No. 8). To date, no objections have been filed. Because no party has objected to the Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendations, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See United States v. Wilson,

864 F.2d 1219, 1221

(Sth Cir. 1989); ef

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) (“A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which an objection is made.”) After such review, the Court finds that the R&R is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law.

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Dkt. No. 5) and, for the reasons set forth therein, this case is DISMISSED for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). This case is CLOSED. isso ORDERED. SIGNED this 30th day of April 2025.

ORLANDO L. GARCIA United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown