John v. Warden FCI Seagoville
John v. Warden FCI Seagoville
Trial Court Opinion
United States District Court NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ROBERT CHARLES JOHN, #27831-034 § V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:25-CV-0668-S-BW WARDEN, FCI SEAGOVILLE : ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, by separate judgment the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under
28 U.S.C. § 2241, received on March 20, 2025 [ECF No. 3], will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust available remedies. A certificate of appealability is not required to appeal the denial of relief under
28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Padilla v. United States,
416 F.3d 424, 425(Sth Cir. 2005). If Petitioner files a notice of appeal, he must pay the $605.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a properly signed certificate of inmate trust account. SO ORDERED. SIGNED May 19, 2025.
Reference
- Status
- Unknown