□ Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT May 28, 2025 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk BROWNSVILLE DIVISION IGNACIO LARA, JR., § “Plaintiff,” § § v. § Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-00188 § 1 UNKNOWN U.S. MARSHAL, ETAL., = § “Defendants.” § § ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s “Report and Recommendation” (Dkt. No. 39) (“R&R”). The R&R recommends that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's “Complaint” (Dkt. No. 1) (“Complaint”) and “Statement” (Dkt. No. 36) (“Amended Complaint”) because the Complaint fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, Defendants are immune from Plaintiff's claims, and Plaintiff’s claims are frivolous. Dkt. No. 39. The R&R was published and sent to Plaintiff by certified and regular mail April 10, 2025. This mail was returned as unclaimed May 7, 2025. Objections to the R&R were due May 21, 2025. Since no objections were filed to the R&R, the Court reviews the magistrate judge’s conclusions for clear error. See Guillory v. PPG Indus.,

(Sth Cir. 2005). Finding no clear error, abuse of discretion, or finding contrary to law, the R&R (Dkt. No. 39) is ADOPTED. Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) and Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 36) are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby ORDERED to close this case.

Signed on this OQ GK day of ( ow , 2025. U2 Rofando Olvera nited States District Jadge