June 10, 2025 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

DANH CONG LE, § CIVIL ACTION NO Plaintiff, § 4:25-cv-00139 § § vs. § JUDGE CHARLES ESKRIDGE § § WELLS FARGO BANK § Defendant. § ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Danh Cong Le proceeds here pro se. The complaint asserts claims against Defendant Wells Fargo Bank for breach of contract, negligence, gross negligence, and unjust enrichment with respect to an alleged mishandling of a check. He. Dkt 1-4. Wells Fargo timely removed. Dkt 1. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Dena Palermo. Dkt 5. Pending is her Memorandum and Recommendation, in which she recommends that this case be dismissed under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for want of prosecution, and that the present circumstances warrant entry of such dismissal with prejudice. Dkt 7. The district court reviews de novo those conclusions of a magistrate judge to which a party has specifically objected. See FRCP 72(b)(3) &

(b)(1)(C); see also United States v Wilson, 864 F2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir 1989, per curiam). The district court may accept any other portions to which there’s no objection if satisfied that no clear error appears on the face of the record. See Guillory v PPG Industries Inc,

(5th Cir 2005), citing Douglass v United Services Automobile Association,

(5th Cir 1996, en banc); see also FRCP 72(b) advisory committee note (1983). No party filed objections. No clear error otherwise appears upon review and_ consideration of the Memorandum and Recommendation, the record, and the applicable law. The Memorandum and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the Memorandum and Order of this Court. Dkt 7. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This is a FINAL JUDGMENT. SO ORDERED. Signed on June 10, 2025 , at Houston, Texas. Adi Alida Hon. Charles Eskridg United States District Judge