Southern District of Texas ENTERED June 24, 2025 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Nathan Ochsner, Clerk SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION JOSE ALFREDO JIMENEZ, § Petitioner, V. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:24-CV-00028 BOBBY LUMPKIN, Respondent. ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 25). The M&R recommends that the Court grant Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment and dismiss Petitioner’s case. Jd. at 12. The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.) (citation omitted). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 25). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment, (D.E. 20), and DISMISSES with prejudice Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, (D-.E. 3). A final judgment will issue

1/2

separately. SO ORDERED. (| /

DAVID §. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas June 24442025

2/2