: Souther District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT □□□ □□□□ □□□ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION SIDNEY MAURICE THOMPSON, IV, § Plaintiff, v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-CV-00246 FACEBOOK META, ; Defendant. ; ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton’s Memorandum and Recommendation (““M&R”). (D.E. 7). The M&R recommends that the Court dismiss this action without prejudice for want of prosecution under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Jd. at 2. The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.) (citation omitted). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the MER is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 7). Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. (D.E. 1). A final judgment will issue separately.

1/2

SO ORDERED. / C MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas July 8, 2025

2/2