. □ Southern District of Texas ENTERED July 17, 2025 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Nathan Ochsner. Clerk SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS □□ BROWNSVILLE DIVISION ROSENDO PALACIOS, § “Petitioner,” § § V. § $ | Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-00108 F. VENEGAS, § “Respondent.” § § ORDER Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s “Report and Recommendation” (Dkt. No. 9) (“R&R”). The R&R recommends that the Court dismiss Petitioner’s “Petition for a Writ of Habeas □ Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241” (Dkt. No. 1) (“Petition”) because the Court lacks subject matter _ Jurisdiction over Petitioner’s claim. Dkt. No. 9. The R&R was published and sent to Petitioner by certified and regular mail June 9; 2025. Dkt. Nos. 9 & 10. This mail was returned as undeliverable June 11, 2025. Dkt. No. 12. Because - this case’s docket entered this return June 18, 2025, id, objections to the R&R were due two weeks later, July 2; 2025. No objections have been filed. The Court thus reviews the magistrate judge’s conclusions for plain error. See Guillory v. PPG Indus.,

(Sth Cir. 2005). Finding no clear error, abuse of discretion, or finding contrary to law, the R&R (Dkt. No. 9) is ADOPTED. Petitioner’s Petition (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is hereby ORDERED to close this case.

Signed on this __\ hay of July, 2025,

cr Po (WY Roldndo Olvera fo United States District Jude