UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT July 21, 2025 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § Civil Action No. 4:22-CV-00954 § 1,983 ROUNDS OF ASSORTED § AMMUNITION, § § Defendant. § ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pending before the Court is the May 27, 2025, Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”) prepared by Magistrate Judge Christina A. Bryan. (Dkt. No. 27). Judge Bryan made findings and conclusions and recommended that Garrett Black’s Motion to Have Some Rights Restored, (Dkt. No. 25), be DENIED, (Dkt. No. 27 at 3). The Parties were provided proper notice and the opportunity to object to the M&R. See

(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No party filed an objection. As a result, review is straightforward: plain error. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc.,

(5th Cir. 2005). No plain error appears. Accordingly, the Court accepts the M&R and adopts it as the opinion of the Court. It is therefore ordered that: (1) Judge Bryan’s M&R, (Dkt. No. 27), is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; and (2) Garrett Black’s Motion to Have Some Rights Restored, (Dkt. No. 25), is DENIED. It is SO ORDERED. Signed on July 21, 2025.

DReEw B. TIPTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE