Southern District of Texas ENTERED July 22, 2025 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Nathan Ochsner. Clerk SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION CODDEY CLINTON WILLIAMS, § § Plaintiff, § V. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-CV-00109 § SAN PATRICIO COUNTY COURT AT LAW § 2, § § Defendant. ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 11). The M&R recommends that the Court dismiss the case without prejudice for failure to prosecute. /d. at 2. The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 11). Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (D.E. 1). A final judgr ill issue/Separ. 4 ely. / SO ORDERED. / f DAVIDS “MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas July 2/97, 2025 1/1]