Faulkner v. Director TDCJ - CID
Faulkner v. Director TDCJ - CID
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION
DEVION LAMONE FAULKNER, § § Petitioner, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:23-CV-45-RWS-JBB § DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID, § § Respondent. §
ORDER Before the Court is Petitioner Devion Faulkner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging the legality of his conviction. Docket No. 1. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Boone Baxter in accordance with
28 U.S.C. § 636. On June 13, 2025, the Magistrate Judge issued a report recommending dismissal of the petition with prejudice. Docket No. 13 at 8. It was further recommended that a certificate of appealability be denied sua sponte.
Id.Petitioner acknowledged receipt of the Report and Recommendation on June 25, 2025 (Docket No. 14), but no objections have been received to date. Because no objections have been received, Petitioner is barred from de novo review by the District Judge of the Magistrate Judge’s proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendations. Moreover, except upon grounds of plain error, an aggrieved party is barred from appellate review of the unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the District Court. See Duarte v. City of Lewisville,
858 F.3d 348, 352(5th Cir. 2017); Arriaga v. Laxminarayan, No. 4:21-CV-00203-RAS,
2021 WL 3287683, at *1 (E.D. Tex. July 31, 2021). The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this case and the Report of the Magistrate Judge. Upon such review, the Court has determined the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. See United States v. Wilson,
864 F.2d 1219, 1221(Sth Cir. 1989) (where no objections to a magistrate judge’s report are filed, the standard of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law”). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 13) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. It is further ORDERED that the above-captioned petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A certificate of appealability is denied sua sponte. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 22nd day of July, 2025.
[Dohert LU Llrpectsr C2. ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Reference
- Status
- Unknown