Ward v. Georgetown Municipal
Ward v. Georgetown Municipal
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Walter Ward, § Plaintiff, § § v. § Case No. 1:25-CV-00935-ADA § Georgetown Municipal, et al., § Defendants. §
ORDER Before the Court is the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Dustin M. Howell. Dkt. 4. Judge Howell issued his report and recommendation on July 17, 2025. As of the date of this order, no party has filed objections to the report and recommendation. A party may file specific, written objections to a magistrate judge’s proposed findings and recommendations within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the report and recommendation, thereby securing de novo review by the district court.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). When no objections are timely filed, the Court reviews the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation for clear error. See United States v. Wilson,
864 F.2d 1219, 1221(5th Cir. 1989). Because the parties have not filed timely objections, the Court has reviewed Judge Howell’s report and recommendation for clear error. Having found no such error, the Court finds that the report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 4) is ADOPTED. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiffs cause of action with prejudice pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). SIGNED on September 5, 2025. CWO. OMon ALAN D ALBRIGHT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown