Nino v. Reyna

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT September 15, 2025 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk LAREDO DIVISION JESUS RAMON NINO § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:24-cv-33 § JUAN MANUEL CERVANTES § REYNA D/B/A TRANSPORTES § JUMA et al. § ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION On August 26, 2025, the Court referred Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint to United States Magistrate Judge Christopher dos Santos for a Report and Recommendation (see Dkt. No. 52). Judge dos Santos issued his report, recommending that: (1) Plaintiff’s motion for leave be granted; and (2) the Clerk of Court be directed to docket Plaintiff’s Second Amended Original Complaint (Dkt. No. 51-2) as the live pleading (Dkt. No. 53 at 4). The fourteen-day objection period has lapsed, and no party objected to these recommendations.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court reviewed the report and recommendation for plain error. CGI Logistics, LLC v. Fast Logistik, No. 5:23-CV-43, 2023 WL 8313341, at *2 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 1, 2023) (Garcia Marmolejo, J.) (citing United States v. Soto, 734 F. App’x 258, 259 (5th Cir. 2018)). Finding none, the Court hereby ADOPTS IN WHOLE Judge dos Santos’s report and recommendation (Dkt. No. 53).

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 51) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to docket Plaintiff’s Second Amended Original Complaint (Dkt. No. 51-2) as the live pleading.

It is so ORDERED.

SIGNED September 15, 2025. ‘ cpl Garcia Marmolejo United States District Judge