UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:25-cv-00137 Kelsey Oliver, Plaintiff, V. Child Protective Services et al., Defendants.

ORDER Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brought this action individually and on behalf on her six children, asserting various constitutional and state law claims. Doc. 5. The case was referred to a magistrate judge. The magistrate judge issued a report recommending that plaintiff’s and her children’s claims be dismissed without preju- dice. Doc. 6. Plaintiff received this report but did not file timely objections. Doc. 7. When there have been no timely objections to a report and recommendation, the court reviews the record only for clear error. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee’s notes to 1983 amend- ment; see also Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n,

(5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded by statute on other grounds,

(b)(1) (extending the time to file objec- tions from ten to fourteen days). The court has reviewed the record and is satisfied that it con- tains no clear error. As such, the court accepts the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations. Plaintiff’s and her chil- dren’s claims are dismissed without prejudice. All pending mo- tions are denied as moot. So ordered by the court on September 16, 2025. —fabok BARKER United States District Judge

-l-