Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT September 18, 202% SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION JAMES LOGAN DIEZ, § § Plaintiff, § V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-CV-00185 BRYAN COLLIER, ef al., : Defendants. : ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock’s Memorandum and Recommendation (““M&R”). (D.E. 10). The M&R recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff's request for a temporary restraining order. /d. at 1. The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See

(b)(1); FED. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge’s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson,

(Sth Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700,

, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.) (citation omitted). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 10). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's request for a temporary restraining order. (D.E. 1); (D.E. 7). SO ORDERED.

1/2

DS. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas September /%*5 2025

2/2